Organizing Committee
 Melody Chan
Brown University  Antonella Grassi
University of Pennsylvania and Università di Bologna  Rohini Ramadas
Brown University  Julie Rana
Lawrence University  Isabel Vogt
Stanford University
Abstract
The Women in Algebraic Geometry Collaborative Research Workshop will bring together researchers in algebraic geometry to work in groups of 46, each led by one or two senior mathematicians. The goals of this workshop are: to advance the frontiers of modern algebraic geometry, including through explicit computations and experimentation, and to strengthen the community of women and nonbinary mathematicians working in algebraic geometry. This workshop capitalizes on momentum from a series of recent events for women in algebraic geometry, starting in 2015 with the IAS Program for Women in Mathematics on algebraic geometry.
Successful applicants will be assigned to a group based on their research interests. The groups will work on openended projects in diverse areas of current interest, including moduli spaces and combinatorics, degenerations, and birational geometry. Several of the proposed projects extensively involve experimentation and computation, which will increase the likelihood that concrete progress is made over the course of five days and provide useful training in computational mathematics.
In their personal statements, applicants should rank in order their top three choices of projects. They should also address their familiarity with the suggested prerequisites.
Application Deadline: February 9, 2020
Confirmed Speakers & Participants
 Speaker
 Poster Presenter
 Attendee
 Virtual Attendee

Roya Beheshti
Washington University

Renee Bell
Université ParisSud

Emma Brakkee
University of Amsterdam

Madeline Brandt
University of California, Berkeley

Juliette Bruce
University of Wisconsin  Madison

Chiara Camere
University of Milano

AnaMaria Castravet
University of Versailles, France

Melody Chan
Brown University

Linda Chen
Swarthmore College

ManWai Cheung
Harvard University

Emily Clader
San Francisco State University

Paola Comparin
UFRO Universidad de La Frontera

María Angélica Cueto
Ohio State University

Chiara Damiolini
Princeton University

Kristin DeVleming
University of California, San Diego

Sarah Frei
Rice University

Angela Gibney
Rutgers University, New Brunswick

Antonella Grassi
University of Pennsylvania and Università di Bologna

Annalisa Grossi
Augsburg University

Lauren Heller
University of California, Berkeley

ALEJANDRA HIDALGO
ICTP International center for theoretical physics.

Daoji Huang
Cornell University

Kelly Jabbusch
University of Michigan  Dearborn

Lena Ji
Princeton University

Elana Kalashnikov
Harvard University

Amanda Knecht
Villanova University

Hannah Larson
Stanford University

Jennifer Li
UMass Amherst

Shiyue Li
Brown University

Svetlana Makarova
MIT

Enrica Mazzon
Max Planck Institute for Mathematics

Margarida Melo
Universita Roma Tre

Kalina Mincheva
Yale University

Gwyneth Moreland
Harvard University

Laura Pertusi
Università degli Studi di Milano

Rohini Ramadas
Brown University

Julie Rana
Lawrence University

Giulia Saccà
Columbia University

Cecília Salgado
UFRJ

Soumya Sankar
University of WisconsinMadison

Alessandra Sarti
Université de Poitiers

Aleksandra Sobieska
Texas A&M University

Libby Taylor
Stanford University

Alexandra Viktorova
Stony Brook University

Bianca Viray
University of Washington

Nivedita Viswanathan
The University of Edinburgh

Isabel Vogt
Stanford University

Rachel Webb
University of Michigan

Corey Wolfe
Tulane University

Weihong Xu
Rutgers

Lei Yang
Northeastern University

Claudia He Yun
Brown University

Aline Zanardini
University of Pennsylvania

Yan Zhou
Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research, Peking University
Application Information
ICERM welcomes applications from faculty, postdocs, graduate students, industry scientists, and other researchers who wish to participate. Some funding may be available for travel and lodging. Graduate students who apply must have their advisor submit a statement of support in order to be considered.
Your Visit to ICERM
 ICERM Facilities
 ICERM is located on the 10th & 11th floors of 121 South Main Street in Providence, Rhode Island. ICERM's business hours are 8:00am  4:00pm during this event. See our facilities page for more info about ICERM and Brown's available facilities.
 Traveling to ICERM
 ICERM is located at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. Providence's T.F. Green Airport (15 minutes south) and Boston's Logan Airport (1 hour north) are the closest airports. Providence is also on Amtrak's Northeast Corridor. Indepth directions and transportation information are available on our travel page.
 Lodging
 To secure ICERM's preferred hotel rate at the Hampton Inn & Suites Providence Downtown, use this link. ICERM regularly works with two additional area hotels for short visits. The Graduate Hotel and Hilton Garden Inn both have discounted rates available. Contact housing@icerm.brown.edu before booking outside of the preferred rate or if you would like to book alternate accommodations.
The only way ICERM participants should book a room is through the hotel reservation links located on this page or through links emailed to them from an ICERM email address (first_last@icerm.brown.edu). ICERM never works with any conference booking vendors and never collects credit card information.
 Childcare/Schools
 Those traveling with family who are interested in information about childcare and/or schools should contact housing@icerm.brown.edu.
 Technology Resources
 Wireless internet access ("BrownGuest") and wireless printing is available for all ICERM visitors. Eduroam is available for members of participating institutions. Thin clients in all offices and common areas provide open access to a web browser, SSH terminal, and printing capability. See our Technology Resources page for setup instructions and to learn about all available technology.
 Discrimination and Harassment Policy
 ICERM is committed to creating a safe, professional, and welcoming environment that benefits from the diversity and experiences of all its participants. Both the Brown University "Code of Conduct" and the "Discrimination and Workplace Harassment Policy" apply to all ICERM participants and staff. Participants with concerns or requests for assistance on a discrimination or harassment issue should contact the ICERM Director or Assistant Director; they are the responsible employees at ICERM under this policy.
 Exploring Providence
 Providence's worldrenowned culinary scene provides ample options for lunch and dinner. Neighborhoods near campus, including College Hill Historic District, have many local attractions. Check out the map on our Explore Providence page to see what's near ICERM.
Visa Information
Contact visa@icerm.brown.edu for assistance.
 Eligible to be reimbursed
 B1 or Visa Waiver Business (WB)
 Ineligible to be reimbursed
 B2 or Visa Waiver Tourist (WT)
 Already in the US?

F1 and J1 not sponsored by ICERM: need to obtain a letter approving reimbursement from the International Office of your home institution PRIOR to travel.
H1B holders do not need letter of approval.
All other visas: alert ICERM staff immediately about your situation.
ICERM does not reimburse visa fees. This chart is to inform visitors whether the visa they enter the US on allows them to receive reimbursement for the items outlined in their invitation letter.
Financial Support
 ORCID iD
 As this program is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), ICERM is required to collect your ORCID iD if you are receiving funding to attend this program. Be sure to add your ORCID iD to your Cube profile as soon as possible to avoid delaying your reimbursement.
 Acceptable Costs

 1 roundtrip between your home institute and ICERM
 Flights on U.S. or E.U. airlines – economy class to either Providence airport (PVD) or Boston airport (BOS)
 Ground Transportation to and from airports and ICERM.
 Unacceptable Costs

 Flights on nonU.S. or nonE.U. airlines
 Flights on U.K. airlines
 Seats in economy plus, business class, or first class
 Change ticket fees of any kind
 Multiuse bus passes
 Meals or incidentals
 Advance Approval Required

 Personal car travel to ICERM from outside New England
 Multipledestination plane ticket; does not include layovers to reach ICERM
 Arriving or departing from ICERM more than a day before or day after the program
 Multiple trips to ICERM
 Rental car to/from ICERM
 Flights on a Swiss, Japanese, or Australian airlines
 Arriving or departing from airport other than PVD/BOS or home institution's local airport
 2 oneway plane tickets to create a roundtrip (often purchased from Expedia, Orbitz, etc.)
 Reimbursement Request Form

https://icerm.brown.edu/money/
Refer to the back of your ID badge for more information. Checklists are available at the front desk.
 Reimbursement Tips

 Scanned original receipts are required for all expenses
 Airfare receipt must show full itinerary and payment
 ICERM does not offer per diem or meal reimbursement
 Allowable mileage is reimbursed at prevailing IRS Business Rate and trip documented via pdf of Google Maps result
 Keep all documentation until you receive your reimbursement!
 Reimbursement Timing

6  8 weeks after all documentation is sent to ICERM. All reimbursement requests are reviewed by numerous central offices at Brown who may request additional documentation.
 Reimbursement Deadline

Submissions must be received within 30 days of ICERM departure to avoid applicable taxes. Submissions after thirty days will incur applicable taxes. No submissions are accepted more than six months after the program end.
Project Descriptions
Project 1: Higher Fano manifolds
Leadership: AnaMaria Castravet (University of Versailles, France) & Roya Beheshti (Washington University)
The project will be centered around investigating the structure of higher Fano manifolds. Fano manifolds are manifolds whose first Chern class intersects all curves positively. This condition has far reaching implications; for example, the cone of effective 1cycles is rational polyhedral, and onedimensional families of such manifolds admit sections. De Jong and Starr introduced 2Fano manifolds in [2], as manifolds with both first and second Chern character positive. Conjecturally, 2Fano manifolds have rational polyhedral cones of effective 2cycles, and twodimensional families of 2Fano manifolds admit sections (provided there is no BrauerManin obstruction).
Some effort has been put into understanding the structure of 2Fano varieties [1,3,4]. Currently, all known examples have Picard number one, and can be described as zero loci of sections of certain vector bundles. Furthermore, the 2Fano condition has been studied for smooth toric varieties in [5]. In this project, we study the following question: is every smooth toric 2Fano isomorphic to a projective space? This has been checked using a computer up to dimension 6, but one project would be to try to prove this, or possibly explore it in dimensions higher than 6.
One can similarly define 3Fano manifolds. There has been little investigation of their structure. One project would be to go through the classification of 2Fano varieties of high index in [2] and decide which ones are 3Fano. Similarly, we may investigate toric 3Fanos: can the new positivity condition be interpreted combinatorially as in the case of 2Fanos in [5] and does that help to prove that the only toric 3Fano manifolds are projective spaces?
Preferred background: Knowledge of algebraic geometry at the level of Hartshorne. Some additional knowledge of toric geometry will be useful, not expected at the time of application.
References
A. J. de Jong and J. Starr, A note on Fano manifolds whose second Chern character is positive, preprint arXiv:math/0602644v1 [math.AG], (2006).
A. J. de Jong and J. Starr, Higher Fano manifolds and rational surfaces, Duke Math. J. Vol. 139 (2007), no. 1, 173–183.
C. Araujo, A.M. Castravet, Classification of 2Fano manifolds with high index, A celebration of algebraic geometry, 1–36, Clay Math. Proc. 18, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2013
C. Araujo, A.M. Castravet, Polarized minimal families of rational curves and higher Fano manifolds, Amer. J. of Math. 134, no. 1 (2012), 87–107 E. E. Nobili, Birational geometry of toric varieties, PH. D.thesis, arXiv: 1204.3883
Project 2: The rational cohomology of A_g
Leadership: Melody Chan (Brown University) & Margarida Melo (Università Roma Tre)
This project studies the moduli spaces A_g of principally polarized abelian varieties of dimension g using techniques from [CGP18]. Just as with M_g the orbifold Euler characteristic and the stable cohomology are classically understood [Bor74, Har71], but the full cohomology ring H^*(A_g;Q) is a mystery even for small g: g ≤ 2 is classical, g = 3 is the work of Hain [Hai02], and g ≥ 4 is already unknown. Computations in the 4 ≤ g ≤ 8 range would already be interesting and new.
We shall focus on the piece of cohomology encoded combinatorially in the boundary. As explained in [BMV11], the moduli spaces Ag admit several wellknown toroidal com pactifications, including the perfect cone and second Voronoi compactifications [AMRT75]. The boundary complexes of these compactifications, which record the irreducible compo nents of the boundary and the combinatorics of how they intersect, may be interpreted as tropical moduli spaces of principally polarized abelian varieties. Moreover, understanding the rational homology of these boundary complexes would yield new results on the ratio nal cohomology of Ag itself, using the comparison theorems and machinery explained in [CGP18]. We shall understand how these pieces fit together, and then design and imple ment computer calculations to study the topology of these tropical moduli spaces, thereby producing cohomology calculations of Ag that were previously inaccessible.
The proposed project fits in to a larger program of identifying boundary complexes of compactified moduli spaces with tropical moduli spaces and using this combinatorial intepretation for applications, for example [CMP, CHMR16, CMR16]. The bestdeveloped case so far is the moduli spaces M_g of curves and its DeligneMumford compactification, whose boundary complex was identified with the tropical moduli space of curves [ACP15]. This identification was then used in [CGP18, CGP19] to construct previously unknown rational cohomology classes in M_g.
Recommended background:
 Since the project is computational at heart, several group members should have demonstrated strength and interest in computer computations, for example in computer algebra systems such as in Sage or Macaulay2.
 Interest in combinatorial aspects of algebraic geometry; a good indicator is basic familiarity with toric varieties, rational polyhedral cone complexes, and polytopes.
 Familiarity with tropical geometry or moduli spaces is a plus, but not absolutely necessary.
References
[ACP15] D. Abramovich, L. Caporaso, and S. Payne, The tropicalization of the moduli space of curves, Ann. Sci. E ́c. Norm. Sup ́er. (4) 48 (2015), no. 4, 765–809.
[AMRT75] A. Ash, D. Mumford, M. Rapoport, and Y. Tai, Smooth compactification of locally symmet ric varieties, Math. Sci. Press, Brookline, Mass., 1975, Lie Groups: History, Frontiers and Applications, Vol. IV. MR 0457437
[BMV11] Silvia Brannetti, Margarida Melo, and Filippo Viviani, On the tropical Torelli map, Adv. Math. 226 (2011), no. 3, 2546–2586. MR 2739784
[Bor74] Armand Borel, Stable real cohomology of arithmetic groups, Ann. Sci. E ́cole Norm. Sup. (4) 7 (1974), 235–272 (1975). MR 0387496
[CGP18] Melody Chan, Søren Galatius, and Sam Payne, Tropical curves, graph complexes, and top weight cohomology of Mg, arXiv:1805.10186, 2018.
[CGP19] Melody Chan, Søren Galatius, and Sam Payne, Topology of moduli spaces of tropical curves with marked points, arXiv:1903.07187, 2019.
[CHMR16] Renzo Cavalieri, Simon Hampe, Hannah Markwig, and Dhruv Ranganathan, Moduli spaces of rational weighted stable curves and tropical geometry, Forum Math. Sigma 4 (2016), e9, 35. MR 3507917
[CMP] Lucia Caporaso, Margarida Melo, and Marco Pacini, Tropicalizing the moduli space of spin curves, arXiv:1902.07803.
[CMR16] Renzo Cavalieri, Hannah Markwig, and Dhruv Ranganathan, Tropicalizing the space of admissible covers, Math. Ann. 364 (2016), no. 34, 1275–1313. MR 3466867
[Hai02] Richard Hain, The rational cohomology ring of the moduli space of abelian 3folds, Math. Res. Lett. 9 (2002), no. 4, 473–491. MR 1928867
[Har71] G. Harder, A GaussBonnet formula for discrete arithmetically defined groups, Ann. Sci. E ́cole Norm. Sup. (4) 4 (1971), 409–455. MR 0309145
Project 3: Moduli Spaces of Curves with Cyclic Action
Leadership: Emily Clader (San Francisco State University)& Rohini Ramadas (Brown University)
The moduli space M_{0,n}bar of genuszero curves with n distinct marked points is a fundamental object in algebraic geometry. This is in part due to its applicability — the moduli space of curves is connected to such fields as enumerative geometry, combinatorics, and mathematical physics — but also, it is interesting as a variety in its own right. It occupies an intriguing middle ground between the simplicity of toric varieties and the intractability of a more general setting. For example, although M_{0,n}bar is not toric for n greater than 4, it enjoys some of the same structure that a toric variety would have, such as an explicitlypresented cohomology ring that is combinatorially describable in terms of boundary strata.
One way in which to probe the connection between M_{0,n} and toric varieties is to modify the moduli problem so that a toric moduli space is indeed obtained. This was first carried out by Losev and Manin, who defined a space L_n that parametrizes genuszero curves with two distinct marked points and n possiblycoinciding marked points, under an appropriate stability condition. The variety L_n is toric, and moreover, its torusinvariant strata are precisely the boundary strata of the moduli space. Combinatorially, these strata label the faces of the (n1)dimensional permutahedron, which is the polytope for the toric variety L_n.
Losev and Manin's work was generalized by Batyrev and Blume from the perspective of root systems. There is a construction of a toric variety associated to any root system, and BatyrevBlume proved that L_n is the toric variety associated to the classical root system A_{n1}. They then gave an analogous modular interpretation of the toric variety associated to the root system B_n: it parametrizes genuszero curves with an involution sigma, one marked fixed point of sigma, one marked orbit of sigma, and n additional marked possiblycoinciding orbits of sigma. The moduli space of such objects is not only toric, but, as in the LosevManin case, its torusinvariant strata are precisely the boundary strata. The associated polytope is a signed permutahedron.
While BatyrevBlume have explored the generalizations of this construction to other root systems (and found that, in types C and D, the toric varieties do not have an equally wellbehaved modular interpretation), the goal of this project is to pursue a different generalization of both LosevManin and BatyrevBlume's work that is both modular and combinatorially rich.
Consider a moduli space M_n^r that parametrizes genuszero curves C with following additional data:
 an action sigma of Z/rZ on C;
 a marked fixed point of sigma;
 a marked orbit of sigma;
 n marked possiblycoinciding orbits of sigma.
The first goal of the project will be to carefully prove that a fine moduli space M_n^r indeed exists, and to identify it explicitly for small values of n and r. From here, we can ask: is M_n^r toric? This is the case when r=1 or r=2, but it is likely false in general, and a second goal is to construct at least one example of a moduli space M_n^r that is not toric. Analogously to the classical moduli space of curves, though, we expect M_n^r to have an interesting combinatorial structure even when it is not toric; indeed, this is the reason for our interest in this moduli space. Ambitious project goals might be to understand the combinatorics of the boundary of M_n^r — if not in terms of polytopes (as in the toric case) then in terms of some other combinatorial structure — and to give an explicit presentation of this moduli space's cohomology.
Preferred Background: Good working knowledge of the moduli space of curves, along the lines of Kock and Vainsencher’s book “An invitation to quantum cohomology".
Project 4: Tropical degreetwo del Pezzo surfaces and their 56 lines
Leadership: María Angélica Cueto (Ohio State University) & Cecilia Salgado (UFRJ)
A persistent challenge in tropical geometry is to emulate tropical versions of classical results in algebraic geometry. One classical example that is absent from the tropical literature, due to its computational complexity, is the case of degree two del Pezzo surfaces and their moduli. In particular, the arrangement of 56 lines on a the classical surfaces becomes an arrangement of 56 metric trees on the corresponding tropical surfaces. Their combinatorial and metric structure remain a mystery.
In addition to their wellknown interpretation of these surfaces as blowups of the projective plane at seven generic points, they also arise as doublecovers of the plane ramified over a smooth quartic curve $C$. The 56 lines on the surface come in $28$ pairs, one pair for each bitangent line to the curve $C$. Recent work on tropical moduli spaces of del Pezzo surfaces and tropical bitangents to smooth plane quartics has provided tools to deal with del Pezzo surfaces of degree two in the tropical realm. The goal of this project is to explicitly compute the tropical moduli spaces of degreetwo del Pezzos, describe their combinatorial types and explore the interplay between the arrangement of metric trees in the surface and the bitangent lines to tropical quartic curves.
Background: Familiarity with del Pezzo surfaces and tropicalization would be helpful. Fondness for combinatorial methods in Algebraic Geometry would be essential. The project will rely on heavy computations using Sage.
References
[1] M. Baker, Y. Len, R. Morrison, N. Pflueger, and Q. Ren. Bitangents of tropical plane quartic curves. Math. Z., 282(34):1017–1031, 2016.
[2] V. V. Batyrev and O. N. Popov. The Cox ring of a del Pezzo surface. In Arithmetic of higherdimensional algebraic varieties (Palo Alto, CA, 2002), volume 226 of Progr. Math., pages 85–103. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 2004.
[3] M. A. Cueto and A. Deopurkar. Anticanonical tropical cubic del pezzos contain exactly 27 lines. arXiv:1906.08196, 2019.
[4] I. V. Dolgachev. Classical algebraic geometry: a modern view. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
[5] M. Kuwata. Twentyeight double tangent lines of a plane quartic curve with an involution and the MordellWeil lattices. Comment. Math. Univ. St. Pauli, 54(1):17–32, 2005.
[6] D. Maclagan and B. Sturmfels. Introduction to tropical geometry, volume 161 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015.
[7] Y. I. Manin. Cubic forms, volume 4 of NorthHolland Mathematical Library. NorthHolland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, second edition, 1986. Algebra, geometry, arithmetic, Translated from the Russian by M. Hazewinkel.
[8] M. Pieropan. On the unirationality of Del Pezzo surfaces over an arbitrary field. Master’s thesis, Concordia University, 2012.
[9] Q. Ren, K. Shaw, and B. Sturmfels. Tropicalization of del Pezzo surfaces. Adv. Math., 300:156–189, 2016.
[10] C. Salgado, D. Testa, and A. VárillyAlvarado. On the unirationality of del Pezzo surfaces of degree 2. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 90(1):121–139, 2014.
[11] M. Stillman, D. Testa, and M. Velasco. Gröbner bases, monomial group actions, and the Cox rings of del Pezzo surfaces. J. Algebra, 316(2):777–801, 2007.
[12] D. Testa, A. VárillyAlvarado, and M. Velasco. Cox rings of degree one del Pezzo surfaces. Algebra Number Theory, 3(7):729–761, 2009.
[13] D. Testa, A. VárillyAlvarado, and M. Velasco. Big rational surfaces. Math. Ann., 351(1):95–107, 2011.
Project 5: Basepoint free cycles on the moduli space of genus zero curves
Leadership: Angela Gibney (Rutgers University, New Brunswick) & Linda Chen Swarthmore College)
Geometric information about projective varieties can be obtained by studying basepoint free cycles. Basepoint free divisors are the pullbacks of ample divisors along morphisms, and as such we think of them as giving rise to morphisms to other projective varieties. Similarly, basepoint free cycles of higher codimension are also pullbacks of loci along morphisms. We study the basepoint free loci of all codimension on the moduli space of pointed genus zero curves that come from the GromovWitten theory of Grassmannians and other homogeneous spaces. The aim of this project is to calculate these loci and gather data to explore several questions: finding conditions that guarantee that such loci are nontrivial, determining which are extremal in nef cones, and finding relations between these and other basepoint free classes.
Preferred Background: Basics of moduli spaces of curves, GromovWitten theory, and Grassmannians.
Project 6: A handson introduction to aspects of the minimal model program and to NoetherLefshetz problems
Leadership: Antonella Grassi (University of Pennsylvania) & Julie Rana (Lawrence University)
The objects of the proposed study are threefolds with negative Kodaira dimension, in particular toric varieties.The applications are density and codimension results for NoetherLefschetz loci in these singular varieties.
The classical Noether–Lefschetz theorem states that any curve in a very general surface X in P^3 of degree d ≥ 4 is a restriction of a surface in the ambient space. The Noether–Lefschetz locus is the locus of surfaces in P^3 of fixed degree where the Picard number is greater than 1.
Of particular interest are the strata of maximal and minimal codimension components.
The surfaces in these strata are characterized by classical geometrical properties.
These results have been partially extended to other varieties.
The project is to use both theory and computational software, such as Macaulay2, to characterize singular (polarized) varieties for which the classical NoetherLefshetz type theorems hold. The needed properties include vanishings and global generation, both of which are crucial ingredients in the Minimal Model Program. If there is interest we will discuss applications to curve counting invariants.
Preferred Background: Working knowledge of toric geometry at the level of Cox’s MSRI lectures. (see also Cox, Little, Schenck. Toric varieties, vol. 124 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011)
References
G. Blekherman, J. Hauenstein, J. C. Ottem, K. Ranestad, and B. Sturmfels, Algebraic boundaries of Hilbert’s SOS cones, Compos. Math., 148 (2012), pp. 1717–1735.
U. Bruzzo, A. Grassi, and A. Lopez. Existence and density of general components of the Noether Lefschetz locus on normal threefolds. arXiv:1706.02081, 2017.
M. L. Green Components of maximal dimension in the NoetherLefschetz locus, J. Diff. Geom., 29 (1989), pp. 295–302.
D. Maulik and R. Pandharipande. GromovWitten theory and NoetherLefschetz theory. In A celebration of algebraic geometry, volume 18 of Clay Math. Proc., pages 469–507. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2013.
C. Voisin, Composantes de petite codimension du lieu de NoetherLefschetz, Comment. Math. Helv., 64 (1989), pp. 515–526.
Project 7: HyperKähler manifolds, moduli spaces of sheaves, and Lagrangian fibrations
Leadership: Giulia Saccà (Columbia University) & Chiara Camere (University of Milano)
The role of hyperKähler (HK) manifolds in algebraic geometry has grown very much in recent years. In this respect two important items, both for studying and constructing examples, are moduli spaces of sheaves on K3 surfaces and Lagrangian fibrations. There will be two proposed projects, both centered around these two structures. In the first one, the participants will construct examples of (possibly singular) Lagrangian fibrations, fibered in Prym varieties. In the second project, the participants will compute the MordellWeil group (i.e., the group of rational sections), of some HK manifolds fibered in Jacobians of curves.
Preferred Background, Any of the following: Some background on coherent sheaves (mostly: on curves and smooth projective surfaces); Jacobians (and compactified Jacobians) of curves; curves and linear systems on surfaces; Some background on HK Manifolds
Project 8: Automorphisms of K3 surfaces
Leadership: Alessandra Sarti (Université de Poitiers) and Paola Comparin (UFRO Universidad de La Frontera)
The main objects of the project are K3 surfaces and their automorphisms. In general, the group of automorphisms plays an important role if one wants to understand the geometric properties of a variety. On the other hand, the K3 surfaces are beautiful algebraic surfaces, with several interesting properties. The easiest example of a K3 surface is the Fermat quartic surface in 3dimensional complex projective space. One remarkable property of K3 surfaces is that the second cohomology group with integer coefficients has the structure of a lattice, i.e. of a free module over the integers with a nondegenerate bilinear form. By using strong results from lattice theory, one can show several fundamental properties of K3 surfaces (Torelli theorem, surjectivity of the period map). The lattice theory is also an important tool when studying the automorphisms group. The aim of the project will be to classify automorphisms of K3 surfaces and/or to study an interesting class of examples which are K3 surfaces carrying an elliptic fibration: one could for example ask about the possible automorphisms of such K3 surfaces and how to describe them. For the project, the computer program MAGMA could be useful.
Preferred background: Basic knowledge of algebraic geometry, as in Hartshorne’s book. A more advanced knowledge of algebraic surfaces and in particular on K3 surfaces is useful, but not necessary.
References
W. P. Barth; K. Hulek; Ch. A. M. Peters; A. Van de Ven. Compact complex surfaces.Second edition. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], 4. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 2004.
A. Beauville. Complex algebraic surfaces. Translated from the 1978 French original by R. Barlow, with assistance from N. I. ShepherdBarron and M. Reid. Second edition. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 34. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
Project 9: Invariants of Fano threefolds over nonclosed fields
Leadership: Isabel Vogt (Stanford University) & Bianca Viray (University of Washington)
Over algebraically closed fields, all Fano curves (i.e., genus 0 curves) and Fano surfaces (i.e., del Pezzo surfaces) are rational; however, they may fail to be rational over nonclosed fields. For example, they may fail to have rational points or they may have nontrivial Brauer groups. Beginning in dimension 3, the situation is more subtle. Fano threefolds have been classified, but not all Fano varieties are even geometrically rational. In this project we will study invariants of some classes of Fano threefolds over nonalgebraically closed fields.
Applicants should have experience with, or at least interest in, working over nonalgebraically closed fields. Knowledge of other topics including Brauer groups and higherdimensional algebraic geometry would be helpful.